Myth History - McNeil and Zinn

Question 1.\nWhy does McNeil favour/apply the term novel explanation to taradiddle?\n\n reply\nHistory is an account of the past, whereas fiction is a likely story. Myt archives, then, is a story of the past likely to have currency. A fib is written to inform kinsfolk of what happened, and a fable is recycled to apologize the centre of what happened.\nMyth and history are similar in ways, as both apologise how things got to be the way they are by telling well-nigh sort of story. But our reciprocal parlance reckons story to be false while history is, or aspires to be, lawful. Accordingly, a historian who rejects someone elses conclusions c anys them mythical, while claiming that his cause views are true. But what seems true to one historian exit seem false to another, so one historians truth becomes anothers myth. (Course Kit, pg 75)\nThis plectron and choosing of facts is what makes history elastic and evolutionary. all culture has its own edition of truth; trut h virtually its own culture as well as the truth  about other cultures. uprightness to one is another persons myth (mythistories). Therefore, all these outside forces of culture, background, relationships, society, etcetera, demand what is true whether the individual realizes it or not.\nMcNeills essay, Mythistory, or Truth, Myth, History, and Historians,  emphasizes the falsehood of historic truth, seeing history as evolving through the discovery of red-hot data and exposure to happy choices and subjective judgments on the array of historical facts. These judgments and choices have nobody to do with scientific methodology.\nMcNeill believes all the evidence  becomes nothing merely a catalogue; it has to be put together for the proofreader in order to be understandable, credible, and useful because facts alone do not give meaning or intelligibility to the record of the past. History (or myth) becomes self-validating.\n\n2. \nWhat are his views on the functions of myth?\n\nResponse\nMyths are usual st...