Comparison Of Management Structure Between Ford Foundation And Heifer International

IntroductionThe purpose of this is to comp ar management structure of two non-profit presidencys , that is to joint Heifer world(prenominal) and Ford establishment1 . Heifer world-wide11 . get on with of handlersThe most important strategical decisions at Heifer world-wide atomic number 18 taken by the c eithering card of managing directors , which unites obligation Agency representatives world(prenominal) representatives and representatives from Heifer International infantry . pact Agencies correspond in the board of handlers include National Catholic Rural Life host , Presbyterian Hunger Program , perform service of the Brethren , Episcopal easement and instruction and saviourian Church (Disciples of saviour , plot of ground the regional reputation features Regional Representatives from Africa , North the States , Asia / randomness peaceful , Mid-West , commutation easterly Europe eastern , sou-east , Central , Northwest and southwestward regions . The climb on of Directors is presided upon by a Chair who is , in handle , assisted by a frailness-Chair (Heifer International , 20071 .2 . decision noble management , senior(a) feebleness moderatewoman of invention Building , elder fault chairwoman of maturation , elder transgression chair of communications and merchandising strategical aggroup also includes Director of Internal Communications Director of Finance , Director of scheme and Operational transmit Director of Communications , Director of market , Director of attainment Centers , advance Liaison /Assistant to the chairman , ill-doing chairman of applied science /CIO , frailness chair of human beings Resources , crime death chair of advocacy , Vice prexy of organisational cultivation , Vice hot seat of Education , Vice President of the Americas , Vice President of Central Eastern /Europe , Vice President of Asia /South Pacific and Vice President of Africa periodic management is through with(p) at the level of Country surface area Offices , U .S . Field Offices and U .S . Regional Offices (Heifer International , 20071 .3 . collective CultureAs for the corporate last and HR practices , it s possible to infer that the make-up actively embraces team ism . It s also concerned with sex equality at all levels of management structure President and CEO , Senior Vice President of Development and Senior Vice President of Institution Building are womanish many women are represented in the Board of Directors and strategic Team (Heifer International 2007 .

populace opinion about the organization is good : in 2004 Heifer International received the prestigious Hilton honour for its contribution to the clear of change the conditions of people living in developing countries (Conrad N . Hilton base of operations , 20042 . Ford rump2 .1 . Board of TrusteesFord Foundation is governed by a Board of Trustees which set policies concerning such issues as finance , investiture , knuckle under making , management paid standards , and geographic cerebrate . To pull through these functions , Committees of the Board of Trustees exist , videlicet Audit decision maker , enthronization , Management and arrangement , Membership , Program proxy and Transactions Committees . Similarly to Heifer International the Board of Trustees aims at cosmea representative in geographic sense : ten eyeshade members are U .S . citizens while others come from different countries (Ford Foundation , 20071 .2 . executive managementExecutive management is performed by Officers , namely President Executive Vice President , secretary , and General Counsel Vice President fro Communications Vice President and Chief investment funds Officer Vice President for Knowledge , Creativity and liberty Vice President for plus Building and Community Development Vice President for cessation and...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper