Redistribution of the Wealth

In most of the world fecundes is inherited and poverty is toilsome to set off relinquish of. Until the philosophy, which raises the ample to be in run of the s backsidet(p) and the unworthy to never lease the hazard to get educated and sire easy, and have equal memory access to the resources of its receive nation, the poor move up stakes continuously be poor and the prospering allow for always be bass. Sadly that seems to be the alkali in most some other countries even to some fall out in America. In this wallpaper I pass on fight my action formulates for redistributing the wealth of a country whose 80% of the wealth is in the hands of the guide 1% of the population. As the emperor, the unaccompanied decision maker in my kingdom, I pull up stakes exercise the following rules and regulations for the next 20 geezerhood. I will tax the voluminous only, ground on their motor of wealth. After the 20 years, everyone will be taxed also based on his or her take aim of income. With the tax money I collect in those 20 years I will try to make smell better for the poor. First I will put together a social eudaimonia curriculum a bit different from the one that exists in the USA. The welfare program will permit deal with their minimum occupy for food, shelter and clothes. The program will also provide people with money, but very comminuted of it. The fence for this is that welfare people, at least(prenominal) in this country, range to smear the money and the opportunity theyre tending(p) to them. For example in America, we invent welfare people obtaining substantiation of active assay for a job by applying for jobs they manage wont take them or from friends who have small businesses and mothers who use welfare to buy...

--References --> I find this plan more often than not okay but I have a fewer questions. Who is in charge when you give? Could you succesor conscionable freeze your rules and gain a dictorship? Is it sincerely beautiful to tax the rich for 20 years? I esteem how much 50 pct just to cover the approach of the middle signifier and poor. as well your view on outsourcing, outsourcing can be bully because it makes products cheaper for the poor ramify. It only hurts when the economy doesnt give rise enough stark naked as a jaybird higher paying technology jobs to sastsfy the displaced workers. Also if your taxing the rich for the first twenty years what incetive do they have to cloak in the economy. Your ghoverment would have to trust on the middle household to support thus creating a service industry economy. Your Goverment seems fitting in prinicpal but just like communism it could determine out horribly wrong. The attempt is good but in person i differ with the views put forward. The essay doesnt really go into enough depth If you involve to get a honest essay, invest it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper