In Penal Colony Discussion on Narration

The tarradiddle of the reputation is in third person through the explorer. The explorers thoughts and emotions are knget by the vote counter but the other characters minds can non be read. Even though the narration is done through the explorer, there are m each(prenominal) instances where we do not know what the explorer is thinking, therefore this can be classified as limited omniscient, moreover, the narrator in the story does not show any emotional attachment to the events around him or comment on the law of what is taking place rather he simply describes the proceedings in a very monotonous way.For example, when the explorer finds out that the condemned man leave behind be put to death by a machine without any chance of defending himself or having his innocence or guilt proven, the narrator shows no reaction to this unjust act. He continues to understate situations which would normally sustain some type of reaction. Perhaps this is done intentionally so as to not influence the reader and let the reader formulate their own thoughts.But, by being a passive bystander as the events unfold, one does timber a sense of helplessness and even some guilt as this line shows The explorer wanted to intervene and possibly bring the social unit thing to a standstill this was no torture such as the officer wished to achieve, this was outright murder. (p. 73). This event, where the officer dies, is called a murder as the overlord purpose of the machine, to execute over twelve hours is not realized. The explorer is strike by the officers devotion to the machine but the escape of action makes the narrator untrustworthy.