Tuesday, April 2, 2019

Juvenile Delinquency Theories Case Study

Juvenile fault Theories Case StudyFor many years now the reliable causes of new-fashioned ungodliness have attr propeled the anxiety of many people. What causes modern delinquency is a major aspect of sociological and criminological studies. By down the stairsstanding what in squareity causes the delinquency, the community will reduce the continuity of the act by imple handsting saloon strategies. There argon several criminological theories that are used to circumscribe and assist in understanding the causes of the off blockadeing act. Some of the fresh delinquency contributors that has attracted the attention of many researchers are family environment, peer influence, parenting styles, community structure and schooling environment.There are several juvenile crimes that have occurred in the U.S. for showcase the juvenile crime perpetrated by Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold that leftfield the residence of Littleton town, Colorado panic-struck and the murder move by Mene ndez brothers against their parents just to mention but a few. The paper will focus on the juvenile crime committed by the Menendez brothers as the case under study. First, an overview of the case shall be considered earlier turning into delinquency/criminological theories to apologize what capability have guide the cardinal to exhaust their parents in relation to juvenile delinquency. Much attention shall be focused on the strength and weaknesses of the chosen surmisal. Finally, an alternative theory that could be used to analyze the case will be reviewed.Overview of the Menendez brothers juvenile crimeErik Menendez conspired with his brother Joseph Menendez to drink down their parents. Erik shot Kitty and Jose Lyle Menendez using a 12-gauge shot shot. First the first trail fail to convict the two brothers, the venire in the retrial found them guilty on the two accounts the first-degree murder and the junto to carry go forth murder. But what could have led the two brothe rs to kill their parents? Both Erik and Lyle were brought up in Princeton, New Jersey where they attended Princeton twenty-four hours School. Lyle went further to attend Princeton University. In 1987 when their family relocated to California Erik enrolled at the Calabasas racy School man Lyle was under disciplinary probation because of poor grades. Lyle later dropped out of school after he was faced with plagiarism allegations. This clearly shows that he was under some form of stress.Jose and Kitty were murdered on twentieth August 1989 in their home. Their neighbors said that they heard firecrackers sound on the black night. Jose was shot in the head while Kitty was shot while trying to escape after being awakened by the gun shoots beyond recognition. To stupefy the crime appear as a home related one, both of them were shot around the kneecap. The two brothers then left and later dumped the shotgun along the way before heading to a movie theater. Upon returning home at around 11 pm in the night Lyle called 911 claiming that some tree trunk had killed their parents. Although, the natural law considered them as suspects, there was no evidence linking them to the crime. This was until the wife of a therapist that the two boys used to promise unearthed a recording that had incriminating evidence. The brothers had opened up to the therapist by telling him that they were experiencing suicidal tendencies due to their guilty conscience and the cerebrations of having killed their own parents. epitomeIn order to understand the reason(s) behind such a frigid murder, we need to consider the available facts. Erik told the jury that they decided to kill their parents because they thought that their parents were going to kill them. Erik said that his begin had been sexually molesting him since he was a child and had insisted on him staying home a few days of the week despite Erik having being enrolled to a college. Lyle, the elder brother, had also been molested but his give had stopped when he was eight years old. Lyle was threatening to expose their yield if he did not stop molesting Erik. This confrontation made the two boys cypher that their parents were plotting to kill them.One of the many theories that can be used to relieve this scenario is the deterrence theory. It puts forward the idea that juveniles commit crime because they choose to. Their actions are based on calculated risks and bene adapteds. In the Menendez case, the two brothers did not kill their parents accidentally. They had the whole murder planned as evidenced by former purchase of the shotguns. They also knew their parents room well enough to aim for a head shot despite the fact that only the TV was on. However, the real question is why did they choose to kill their parents instead of reporting to the police or any other relevant authority? There are several answers that can answer that question.They had fear. They feared their parents especially their father w ho had dominated and controlled their lives since childhood. Their father was also very strict when it came to tennis and Erik hated being under constant pressure to play better. He feared failing his father by performing poorly in the tennis court. Lyle, on the other hand, feared that if he did not do something to stop his father from molesting his younger brother, the sexual rib would continue well into their adulthood and would impact negatively on Erik in school as it had done to him. Additionally, he also feared what people would hypothesise when such news was revealed to the public. Their family name would be tainted. It was these fears combined that led them to make a excerption- a choice to kill their parents. This was the only method that would act as a solution for each of the brothers fears. This is because it would carry away their abusive and strict father without the public ever knowing the real reason behind the brutal elimination. The decision to arrive at this c hoice may also have been greatly influenced by the fact that the brothers held the opinion that their parents were going to kill them. It was only fair to kill the parents before they killed them.However, from the pursuances point of view, the brothers did not murder their parents so as to end years of sexual molestation and strict parenting. The court claimed that their sole author for the murder was the large and attractive inheritance left behind by the parents. Their family owned a $14 million estate. This accusation was based on the fact that barely six months after the murder, Erik bought himself a Rolex, a Jeep, a house and some clothes which were far too expensive accustomed his age of 22. In his defense, Erik said that he had feelings of regret and remorse whenever he spent their parents money knowing that he was the one who had committed the murder. harmonise to the brothers, the benefit of getting rid of their molesting parents was greater than the risk of a womb-to- tomb prison sentence. This reinforces the deterrence theory which suggests that when the benefits of committing a crime outweigh the risks, juvenile delinquency increases.It is not possible to analyze the entire case by using only one theory. Another possible theory that could explain the juvenile behavior exhibited by the brothers is Sheldons somatype theory. This theory explains that our individual body shapes and structures can contribute greatly to our criminal tendencies. He suggests that mesomorphs, or muscular, solid and firm people are more aggressive and assertive when it comes to reacting to situations in life. Their bodies allow them to commit crimes much easier than their larger counterparts, the endomorphs.This theory is useful in this case study since Erik was a fairly good tennis player. That performer that his body bore athletic features making him a mesomorph. His physical air may have contributed in the murder in that he considered himself fit to handle a shotgu n and he was ready to fight backside should there be any resistance from the parents.Another theory that might help shed some light on this murder is Lombrosos atavism theory which suggests that some children are born with criminal traits hereditary from their parents. Eriks father exhibited criminal tendencies with his sexual abuse. It is only fair to admit that Erik and Lyle got their delinquent behavior from their father.ReferencesJuvenile Delinquency Theories. Retrieved from http//juvenilejustice190.blogspot.com/2012/10/oncea-criminal-always-criminal-this-is.htmlMenendez Brothers on visitation Erik Testifies He Feared Parents. Retrieved from http//edition.cnn.com/2007/US/law/12/10/court.archive.menendez5/index.html?_s=PMUSMenendez brothers trial hinges on tape Two rich young men who shot their parents have gained supporters as their bizarre story unfolded. Now the two juries must decide, reports Phil Reeves. Retrieved from http//www.independent.co.uk/news/world/menendez-brot hers-trial-hinges-on-tape-two-rich-young-men-who-shot-their-parents-have-gained-supporters-as-their-bizarre-story-unfolded-now-the-two-juries-must-decide-reports-phil-reeves-1505930.html

No comments:

Post a Comment