Leaders vs Managers Essay

agree to many scholars, management is a basic solelyy the implementation of already established processes such as planning, staffing, cadence bring aboutance and budgeting thereby enabling an get along-up to do come up. On the otherwise hand, drawshiphip is entirely divergent. It can be described as fetching an organization to the future, exploring and successfully exploiting opportunities that come out up. leadinghip is about having vision, empowerment and just about importantly providing useful change in the organization. The main divergencys between leaders and managers are the relationship between the followers and managers and leaders, how leaders and managers dissolve problems, and the digression in emotional intelligence between leaders and managers.Leaders and managers gravel a difference in emotional intelligence. A leader is an man-to-man who strategizes a visionary and most importantly several(prenominal) one(a) who inspires other deal to greatness. In order to achieve this, while leading one must share their vision with the staff or plurality brought together to solve a problem or bring forth a strategy. Leaders respond as role models, motivate their staff, inspire cooperation and create a union both inside and outside of the organization. They mostly follow their intuition which in most cases benefits the company and in most cases they gain followers who break down loyal to them and the organization.This is a direct contradiction to managers who carry out their book of instructions by the book and follow the organizations policy to the letter and as a result the staff may or may not be loyal to them. Even when the idea of a divinely appointed leader prevailed, there existed a contrary view that the leader was actually empowered by followers, this theory was analyzed by doubting Thomas Paine Titles are but nicknamesit is common opinion only that makes them anything or nil . . . . Abody of men, holding themselves account able to nobody, ought not to be trusted by anybody (1944, pp. 59-60, 63). some other major difference between leaders and managers is how their duties and relationship with their followers differ. A leader creates or rather innovates whilst the manager administers , meaning that the leader is the someone who comes up with fresh ideas in order to represent the bulk of the organization into a new direction that is more beneficial and profitable. He has to come up with new strategies and tactics by keeping his focus on thehorizon constantly. It is important for him to be updated on the latest trends as well as studies and the skill sets.Contrary to this, a manager exactly maintains a system that has already been established and is in use. It is his duty to maintain conquer and ensure that things run normally and everyone in the staff is pulling their exercising weight and contributing fully and effectively. One of the distinguishing characteristics of a typical manager is how dru g-addicted he is on the activities of a variety of other people to perform his job effectively. (Kotter, 1983, p. 360). He is rigid and unable to be creative in carrying out his duties, thereby barring him from being considered a business leader.According to Richard Rosenberg, (1992) one of the most profound employments of the difference between leaders and managers is how computers create significant changes in any organization. He illustrates how information is able to travel from point to bottom effectively without the intervention of managers somewhere in between. This shows how the difference between leaders and managers which is that managers are easily replaceable and in some cases they are not required at all to some extent. Leaders inspire greatness and effectiveness unlike managers who more or slight rely on control.In other words, leadership is not what one does but actually how they respond to you. If people do not subscribe to join your cause because you cannot rea lly be considered as a leader since they have inspired no one. If people do and then join your cause then it would mean that you have inspired them, thereby creating a bond with them and the company, which is very important particularly if the organization or business is changing rapidly and needs people who believe in it to support its mission.Leaders and managers handle and prepare for problems in a different ways. Managers prepare themselves for turbulent measures and during these times the primary task is to make sure that the organizations capacity to survive and to ensure that the it maintains its structural strength as well as is capacity to survive loser and adapt as quickly as possible in the shortest time period (Peter D., 1980). Business leaders instill a staff allegiance that a manager cannot be able to because of his rigid methods and lack of spontaneity. In the case of managers, their primary job is to control theirstaff by aiding them to arrest their assets and d iscover their greatest talents.In order to do this they have to kip down the people wagering for them and understand their abilities and interests. G. Lumsden (1982) describes how middle managers model themselves on top managers in a form of hierarchical mimicry what happens is that the behavior inheritance persists. As it is passed down deeper in the organization, sans power, such behavior begins not to work so well. And at lower levels it gets muddied even further because its being used on individuals who dont understand it, arent impressed by it, or are downright opposed to it. (p. 8)A leader focuses on the reasons why to make certain decision whereas a manager considers how and at what times decisions are made. Managers prefer to execute plans thence and maintain the status quo without deviating even when failures are experienced. If the company experienced failures, then a leader would learn from it and use it as a miniature point in order to get better and avoid losses in future. Levine and M. Crom (1993) in their book The leader in you highlight an example of leadership changes and state that Good human relation skills have the expertness to transform people from managing others to leading them.People can learn how to move from directing to guiding, from competing to collaborating and from operating under secrecy to one of sharing all of the information required, from a mode of passivity to a mode of risk of infection taking, from one of regarding people as an expense to one of viewing people as an asset, (P.15)In conclusion, management and leadership are not necessarily mutually exclusive. They are however different in that leadership entails extravagance as well as steering an organization whereas management is simply overseeing and delegating.